Re-reading More's Utopia, I've decided that not all of Book I is absolutely necessary to read--the descriptions of the island of Utopia are far more interesting. This'll keep your total reading for this week the same, and cut way down on next week's. So, for 5/4, please just read:
- "Thomas More to Peter Giles, Greetings" (521-24)
- Book I, only through Raphael's dialog with the Cardinal about thieves, slaves and the death penalty (524-35)
- And then from Book II, just up to the section entitled "The Travels of the Utopians" (545-56)
Q1 (Sophia): How would you describe the tone of the opening letter to Peter Giles? If you had read it without knowing that Utopia wasn’t a real place, and that Raphael was a made-up character, what would you think? How does that effect the tone?
Q2 (James): What do you make of Raphael’s argument against private property? What historical events does More seem to be reacting to? (Hint: check out this passage, “Your sheep . . . that used to be so meek and eat so little. Now they are becoming so greedy and wild that they devour human beings themselves, as I hear,” p. 531).
Q3 (Emily): What do you think of Raphael’s alternative to capital punishment as a penalty for theft?
Q4 (Carrie): Why does More set Utopia in the Americas (i.e., in the “New World”)?
Q5 (Mardy): Based on what you have read about Utopia so far, what do you think would be the ramifications if certain of their laws and customs were imported to Taiwan? Pick a couple. (Bonus: Is a Utopia, or perfect society, possible?)
Q6 (Debbie): Say something about the “occupations” of the Utopians (550-53).
Q7 (Verthandi): Say something about the “social relations” of the Utopians (553-56).
Q8 (Valerie): What do you make of this Raphael Hythloday figure? How seriously do you think we should take him? (Hint: Look at the early footnote about his name; does that undercut what he says, or does it merely relieve More of responsibility for his character’s controversial ideas?)